How do you think about the comprehensibility of the insight summary generated by INFAR? |
Very easy to understand
Easy to understand
Not easy to understand for some parts
Difficult to understand
|
4 (33%)
3 (25%)
5 (42%)
0 (0%)
|
Without INFAR, how do you think about the difficulty of analyzing user reviews? |
Highly difficult
Difficult
Not very difficult
Easy
|
5 (42%)
7 (58%)
0 (0%)
0 (0%) |
How much time do you think INFAR can save for user review analysis? |
Over 50%
30%~50%
10%~30%
0 |
6 (50%)
3 (25%)
3 (25%)
0 (0%)
|
How do you think about the information given by INFAR? |
Not containing any unnecessary information
Containing some unnecessary information
Containing many unnecessary information
|
4 (33%)
8 (67%)
0 (0%)
|
How do you think about the usefulness of the word cloud part? |
Highly useful
Useful
Possibly useless
Very useless
|
7 (58%)
4 (33%)
1 (8%)
0 (0%)
|
How do you think about the usefulness of the extracted salient topics? |
Highly useful
Useful
Possibly useless
Very useless
|
8 (67%)
3 (25%)
1 (8%)
0 (0%)
|
How do you think about the usefulness of the extracted abnormal topics? |
Highly useful
Useful
Possibly useless
Very useless
|
6 (50%)
4 (33%)
2 (17%)
0 (0%)
|
How do you think about the usefulness of the extracted causal factors? |
Highly useful
Useful
Possibly useless
Very useless
|
4 (33%)
4 (33%)
4 (33%)
0 (0%)
|
How do you think about the usefulness of the extracted correlated topics? |
Highly useful
Useful
Possibly useless
Very useless
|
5 (42%)
5 (42%)
2 (17%)
0 (0%)
|
How do you think about the usefulness of the whole summary provided by INFAR? |
Highly useful
Useful
Possibly useless
Very useless
|
5 (42%)
6 (50%)
1 (8%)
0 (0%)
|